Select Player .qxc

Select Player .qxc Started by YungLee 5,025 Views Reply 17 Like 0 Dislike 0
	By YungLee Linked :	Quote

2011.07.25 Builds.exe flawlessly AllKill<{(IM)}>.qxc
Sort by newest replies Sort by oldest replies
	By AppleAndOrange	Quote
- 2011.08.11 Quote : I think a boomerang just hit you square in the face. I didn't miss his point. How could anyone? He exaggerated it and said impossible definitions to underline his point . His point is flawed, which I pointed out. That he needs rediculous and impossible definitions to prove a point means that he is mostly lying his ass off, and it makes him look stupid, when all he wanted to was trying to act smart - but failed miserably - just like you. Speaking of missing the point, I think you missed mine. You have no point if you missed the point to begin with. I'll make it very clear for you. His point was that all the Zergs he knows call the build that QXC did an all-in if it kills the other player.. even if everything they are doing behind it indicates that it is nothing close to an all-in, such as expanding and making more workers.. which is what QXC was doing. He just wanted to exaggerate the point to emphasize it. So unless there was some underlying sarcasm in your post, you, sir, completely missed the point of the post you were replying to. :) And he's pretty much right. So many builds are labeled "all-ins" which clearly aren't. There is a massive difference between all-in and pressure.
	By Dracolich	Quote
- 2011.08.10 Quote : It's not even funny how badly you missed the point. Actually, it is kinda funny. I think a boomerang just hit you square in the face. I didn't miss his point. How could anyone? He exaggerated it and said impossible definitions to underline his point . His point is flawed, which I pointed out. That he needs rediculous and impossible definitions to prove a point means that he is mostly lying his ass off, and it makes him look stupid, when all he wanted to was trying to act smart - but failed miserably - just like you. Speaking of missing the point, I think you missed mine.
	By ChinrosBeanie420	Quote
- 2011.08.10 samefag much yunglee?
	By AppleAndOrange	Quote
- 2011.08.10 Quote : How can you declare a time where you are able to build 3 CCs(and really expanding all around the map) all the while you are killing your opponent - the beginning of the game? Not that it is really possible to call it beginning of the game, when you are finishing your opponent, but let's let that slide for a while. It's not even funny how badly you missed the point. Actually, it is kinda funny.
	By Dracolich	Quote
- 2011.08.10 Quote : According to every zerg I play, if you kill them in the beginning of the game, it's an all in. Even if you build 3 command centers while you're killing them and expanding all around the map, and didn't send a single SCV in with your 'all in', it's still an 'all in'. How can you declare a time where you are able to build 3 CCs(and really expanding all around the map) all the while you are killing your opponent - the beginning of the game? Not that it is really possible to call it beginning of the game, when you are finishing your opponent, but let's let that slide for a while.
	By OPL3SA2	Quote
- 2011.08.09 Quote : QXC wasn't all in. Go watch the game again. He dropped a CC as he attacked. According to every zerg I play, if you kill them in the beginning of the game, it's an all in. Even if you build 3 command centers while you're killing them and expanding all around the map, and didn't send a single SCV in with your 'all in', it's still an 'all in'.
	By Dracolich	Quote
- 2011.08.08 Quote : The all kill on IM was well played by QXC but people seem to be forgetting that it was very poorly played by IM, they threw out no names and relied on one player, not even the best on their team, to come in at the end and all kill FXO. QXC has skills but IM definitely handed him the match all the same. Are you trying to deflate the win against MVP? Two time GSL winner and recent MLG winner? In his fourth match nonetheless, which makes it even more astounding; fatiqued, and the IM team had plenty of material to analyze. Only fault IM made was using IM Dreamertt, when IM Bibi already failed. They should have tried Yonghwa or Seed instead. The two first were understandable. When you know Nestea is being spared for GSL, then MVP is the second best choice.
	By DraMas	Quote
- 2011.08.05 Quote : who did he lost to in the code A qual? He lost to DonRaeGu. Artosis taped the games and has them up on youtube. They are pretty good. Actually h lsot to DRG last qualifiers. He lost to Choya these qualifiers.
	By AppleAndOrange	Quote
- 2011.08.05 Quote : The all kill on IM was well played by QXC but people seem to be forgetting that it was very poorly played by IM, they threw out no names and relied on one player, not even the best on their team, to come in at the end and all kill FXO. QXC has skills but IM definitely handed him the match all the same. I don't think anyone would attempt to dispute this, we all know that IM put out some of their worse players.. but the thing is, give credit where credit is due.. QXC played 4 games in a row, I believe 3 of which were quite long, and won all of them. I find that pretty impressive all the same.. the worst Koreans are still better than many foreigners.
	By dwconklin	Quote
- 2011.08.05 who did he lost to in the code A qual? He lost to DonRaeGu. Artosis taped the games and has them up on youtube. They are pretty good.
	By YungLee	Quote
- 2011.08.04 who did he lost to in the code A qual?
	By Craterpillar	Quote
- 2011.07.27 The all kill on IM was well played by QXC but people seem to be forgetting that it was very poorly played by IM, they threw out no names and relied on one player, not even the best on their team, to come in at the end and all kill FXO. QXC has skills but IM definitely handed him the match all the same.
	By Username	Quote
- 2011.07.26 Quote : For the first 3 games he plays a very passive but solid hellion into air defence build. Then in the final game he opens with the passive helion build again, only to surprise mvp by going into an aggressive banshee 1 base all in. Props to qxc. I'm almost 100% sure that if mvp went out 1st or 2nd that he would of won instead because he most likely would of played safer, however he thought he knew what qxc would do and that caused him the game. QXC wasn't all in. Go watch the game again. He dropped a CC as he attacked.
	By Dotluigi	Quote
- 2011.07.26 For the first 3 games he plays a very passive but solid hellion into air defence build. Then in the final game he opens with the passive helion build again, only to surprise mvp by going into an aggressive banshee 1 base all in. Props to qxc. I'm almost 100% sure that if mvp went out 1st or 2nd that he would of won instead because he most likely would of played safer, however he thought he knew what qxc would do and that caused him the game.
	By YungLee	Quote
- 2011.07.25 General Builds... uhh.. I watched it LIVE. not going to buy ticket either... Seemed to be better than some general build or acme.build... I would really have to watch them again...
	By YungLee	Quote
- 2011.07.25 Flawless builds?? pfft.. I watched it live@! ...He won against all 3 races.. ok.. he had these really general builds and executed them perfectly...
	By YungLee	Quote
- 2011.07.25 He did Execute his builds flawlesslywell.. I watched it Live. The AllKill gets a grade A(7). if it was a test... The Result of Korea Mentality?
Top ▲ « First 1 Last »

Current GSL/GSTL Info.

Hot Topics

: Caster Feedback - please leave your c...
Started by : GOM.Snowbird , Re : 1,940

: Concerning casters
Started by : [GOM]Junkka , Re : 275

: Arena of Legends - Feedback
Started by : GOM.Snowbird , Re : 152